有争议但可能并非无稽之谈：SpaceX的招聘可能存在问题。
好的，这只是社会科学，但请注意以下几点：<p>马斯克今天发帖邀请人们提供三条卓越能力的证明，如果他们想加入这家有史以来最昂贵和“最具创新性”的公司——SpaceX。<p>但是，当你遵循规则时，如何能够创新呢？如果你只提供1、2或4个理由，那又如何？为什么会有人愿意为一个观点非常可疑且有争议的人工作呢？看起来SpaceX不可能彻底改变世界，尽管他们已经努力了20多年，但在这20多年里，他们并没有实现真正的革命性变化。原因显而易见。
查看原文
OK, this is just social science but note this:<p>Musk posted today for people to give 3 proofs of exceptional ability if they want to join the most expensive and "most innovative" company ever - Spacex.<p>But how can you innovate when you follow the rules? what if you send 1, 2 or 4 reasons? and why would anyone work for someone with very questionable and controversial views? It doesn't seem possible for Spacex to revolutionize the world, change it: sure they do...for 20+ years but they fail to revolutionize for 20+ years.
And the reasons are obvious.