问HN：是我一个人觉得，还是在过去三周里Gemini变得糟糕了？
作为一名使用Gemini Pro计划已有9个月的人，我注意到自5月初以来，我在使用Gemini时遇到的速率限制大幅增加。
这似乎与更新的用户界面和Gemini 3.5预览模型的发布有关。
在今年的大部分时间里，Gemini是我快速回答简单问题的首选模型。谷歌搜索插件使得提问变得非常简单，而在每月20美元的计划下，它似乎具备了无限的研究和复杂答案的能力。与此同时，我很少使用Claude，大部分Pro计划的使用都留给了Claude Code代币。现在我发现，Gemini的速率限制比Claude更严重。难道计算资源在后台正在从Gemini转移？
也许大型语言模型的计算资源终于开始摆脱对直接消费者使用的补贴。不过，我之前一直认为Gemini会是这个用例中最后一个幸存的模型，因为谷歌似乎有最多的资金可以投入。
查看原文
As someone who's been using the Gemini Pro plan for the past 9 months, I noticed a massive jump in the amount of rate-limiting I'm getting from Gemini since around the beginning of May.<p>It seems to coincide with the updated UI and the release of the Gemini 3.5 Preview model.<p>For the better part of this year, Gemini was my go-to model for answering simple questions quickly. The google search plug-in made it super easy to ask, and it seemed to have endless capacity for research and complex answers on the $20/month plan. Meanwhile, I used Claude very sparingly, and saved most of my Pro plan for Claude Code tokens. Now I find that I'm rate-limited by Gemini harder than Claude. Is compute being shifted away from Gemini behind the scenes?<p>Maybe LLM compute is finally moving away from subsidized direct consumer use. Still, I had previously thought that Gemini would be the last man standing in that use case, as Google seemed to have the most money to burn.