是否有可能存在一个没有五眼国家服务器且仅使用RAM基础设施的VPN?

3作者: yanbinette大约 1 个月前原帖
我在AWS上构建了多年,最近深入研究了隐私和网络问题。随着我了解的深入,我愈发意识到大多数VPN提供商都在做表面功夫。 我看到的问题是:“无日志”在你的服务器物理位于美国、英国、加拿大或澳大利亚时毫无意义。搜查令就是搜查令。即使是我尊重的提供商,如Mullvad和Proton,也在五眼联盟国家设有服务器。 我在考虑的方案: - 服务器仅位于冰岛、瑞士、卢森堡、罗马尼亚和日本 - 仅使用RAM——没有硬盘,设计上无法存储日志,重启后清除所有数据 - 使用WireGuard - 开源,年度Cure53审计 - 支持比特币/门罗币,无需账户 收支平衡大约在200-300个客户。初始基础设施可能需要每月500-1000美元。 我有个诚恳的问题:Mullvad是否已经在这个市场定位上做得足够好,以至于没有空间?还是“零五眼+可证明无日志”对于特定细分市场来说是一个真正的差异化因素? 我也很好奇是否有人在冰岛或卢森堡具体经营基础设施业务的经验。
查看原文
I&#x27;ve been building on AWS for years and got deep into privacy&#x2F;networking recently. The more I learned, the more I realized most VPN providers are theatre.<p>The problem I see: &quot;no-logs&quot; is meaningless if your servers are physically in the US, UK, Canada or Australia. A warrant is a warrant. Even providers I respect like Mullvad and Proton have servers in Five Eyes countries.<p>What I&#x27;m thinking: - Servers only in Iceland, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Romania, Japan - RAM-only — no disk, no logs possible by design, reboot wipes everything - WireGuard - Open source, annual Cure53 audit - BTC&#x2F;Monero, no account required<p>Break even is around 200-300 customers. Infrastructure to start is maybe $500-1000&#x2F;month.<p>Honest question: does Mullvad already own this positioning well enough that there&#x27;s no room? Or is &quot;zero Five Eyes + provably no logs&quot; a real differentiator for a specific segment?<p>Also curious if anyone has experience running infrastructure businesses in Iceland or Luxembourg specifically.