问HN： “没有复制源代码”仍然是一个足够的版权辩护理由吗？
我们都熟悉Corgi事件：https://x.com/mfts0/status/2070080422482977095
由于大型语言模型（LLMs）显著降低了创建新应用程序的门槛，我看到越来越多关于版权和不正当竞争的案例。
我见过并参与过一些这样的案例。通常需要专家证人。
我很好奇社区对此的看法。
“现在软件开发者感受到了作者和艺术家的感受。” https://x.com/PriyRanjan96/status/2070204156703568377
有几种说法：复制用户界面是可以的，你的产品不够有差异化。
以下是对此情况的法律评估：https://x.com/jessebradner/status/2070492879718350986
查看原文
We are all familiar with the Corgi event: https://x.com/mfts0/status/2070080422482977095<p>With the barrier to create new apps having dropped significantly thanks to LLMs, I am seeing more cases about copyright and unfair competition.<p>I've seen and participated in some of these cases. Usually expert witnesses are required.<p>Curious to hear the community stance on this one.<p>"Now software developers are feeling what authors and artist felt". https://x.com/PriyRanjan96/status/2070204156703568377<p>There are several claims of: Copying UI is Ok, your product is not undifferentiated enough.<p>Here is a legal assessment of the situation: https://x.com/jessebradner/status/2070492879718350986