问HN：你用什么提示来证明人工智能可能出错？
刚刚听到我们的一位前辈在向一位新实习生解释，人工智能实际上可能会出错，无论它的回答听起来多么优雅和结构良好。我在想大家用什么问题或提示来向他人证明这一点。我想这可能取决于每个人的专业领域，或者有些人会问一些众所周知的事实，这些事实曾经受到“曼德拉效应”的影响。附言：作为一名非母语者，我原本打算通过人工智能来提升文本的清晰度和可理解性，但在想起一些关于更喜欢原始文本的评论后，我决定不这样做 :)
查看原文
Just over-heard one of our seniors trying to explain to a new intern that AI can actually be wrong, no matter how much its answers sound very eloquent and well-structured.<p>I was wondering what question/prompt everyone uses to prove so to others.<p>I assume it depends on each person's expertise, or some people ask about a fact that is well-known as having been a victim of the mandela effect.<p>P.S.
As a non-native speaker, I was about to pass my submission through AI to improve text clarity and understandability, but after remembering some comments about prefering the original text, I decided against it :)