请问HN：你们是如何纠正大型语言模型的空间推理能力的？
我正在开发一个复杂的多部件3D打印产品，需要一些来自大型语言模型（LLMs）的工程输入。我使用的是最高级别的Gemini Pro推理、Fable和K3 Max，并将所有设置调至最高。
我面临的问题是如何在杠铃套筒上安装传感器。这个传感器是一个半空心的100mm圆柱体，直径为60mm，套筒部分有一个50mm直径、50mm深的管状切口。（其实比这要复杂一些。）
我正在尝试头脑风暴不同的夹紧机制，并评估几种设计的耐用性和可制造性。
无论我尝试什么，所有LLMs的输出都非常离谱，尤其是当你要求制作技术图纸时。Anthropic的表现一直是最糟糕的，而Gemini，令人惊讶的是，表现最好。
但没有一个模型能够详细理解各个部件的具体位置，除了不断输出一段段奇怪的想法，包括在凹槽环TPU夹头上使用旋转凸轮夹具（显然，这是一个“绝妙的枢轴”）之类的东西。
这是“未征服的边界”吗？我需要重新启用我的AutoCAD吗？ :)
查看原文
I'm working on a complex multi-part 3D-printed product, and I needed some engineering input from LLMs. I use highest Gemini Pro reasoning levels, Fable, and K3 Max with everything tuned to highest.<p>The problem I'm facing is mounting a sensor on a barbell sleeve. The sensor is a semi-hollow 100mm cylinder, 60mm diameter, with a 50mm diameter 50mm deep tube cutout for the sleeve. (It's a bit more complex than that.)<p>I'm trying to brainstorm different clamping mechanisms, and evaluate durability and manufacturability of several designs.<p>No matter what I try, the output of all LLMs is absolutely wild, especially if you ask to make a technical drawing. Anthropic reliably been the worst, and Gemini, surprisingly, the best.<p>But none understand what goes where in any detail, besides spewing paragraph and paragraph of wild ideas including rotational cam clamps over a recessed ring TPU collet (apparently, a "brilliant pivot") and stuff like this.<p>Is this the "unconquered frontier"? Do I need to blow dust off my AutoCAD? :)