16作者: donutthejedi29 天前原帖
I (17y&#x2F;o) have been developing a rocket launch simulation that allows the user to explore what it&#x27;s like launching a rocket from earth and putting it into orbit. This idea originally started as an educational simulation but as i&#x27;ve gone more down the rabbit hole the more i&#x27;ve wanted to make it realistic. The problem is that I&#x27;ve never had a formal orbital mechanics class or anything like that so I don&#x27;t know what I&#x27;m missing, what I currently have implemented is:<p><pre><code> Variable gravity Variable Atmospheric drag (US Standard Atmosphere 1976) Multi-stage rockets Closed-loop guidance &#x2F; pitch programs (works well within ranges 350km to 600km) Orbital prediction and thrusting options to change your orbit. </code></pre> The feedback I&#x27;m looking for is: UI improvements and possible future physics implementations that I can work on.<p>Current code and physics can be found at: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;donutTheJedi&#x2F;Rocket-Launch-Simulation" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;donutTheJedi&#x2F;Rocket-Launch-Simulation</a>
216作者: usrme29 天前原帖
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sprites.dev&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sprites.dev&#x2F;</a>
13作者: hiepler29 天前原帖
I built this as a personal open-source project to explore how EU AI Act requirements can be translated into concrete, inspectable technical checks.<p>The core idea is local-first compliance: – risk classification (Articles 5–15, incl. prohibited use cases) – bias evaluation using CrowS-Pairs – automatic Annex IV–oriented PDF reports – no cloud services or external APIs (browser-based + Ollama)<p>I’m especially interested in feedback on whether this kind of technical framing of AI regulation makes sense in real-world projects.
1作者: akardapolov29 天前原帖
Hi HN,<p>I built Dimension-TT because working with standard Swing JTable (and JXTable) usually involves a lot of casting, untyped Object[] arrays, and manual column index management.<p>This library creates a typed layer over the standard components. instead of addRow(new Object[]{...}), you work with setItems(List&lt;T&gt;).<p>Key features:<p>- Typed Rows: Map POJOs directly to table rows. - Annotation Schema: Define column order, visibility, and names using @TTColumn on your model class. - Modern Tech Stack: It requires Java 24+. It uses the JDK Class-File API for build-time scanning (indexing schemas without loading classes) and MethodHandles for high-performance runtime binding. - SwingX Support: seamless integration with JXTable.<p>I know Swing is &quot;legacy&quot; technology to many, but it is still widely used in enterprise desktop apps and IDE plugins. I wanted to bring modern Java ergonomics to that ecosystem.<p>Check it out if you are still keeping the Swing torch burning!
1作者: zhyder29 天前原帖
Engineers are increasing setting up coding agents to run continuously, some running multiple agents in parallel. I&#x27;ve struggled to adopt these because I&#x27;ve struggled to build confidence without full code review.<p>How are y&#x27;all reviewing all this massive code output? How can it possibly scale, as the agents run faster or as you add agents?<p>I guess we&#x27;ll have to learn to give up some control; we&#x27;ll stop reviewing all lines of code, and increasingly rely on AI tools to summarize and flag specific lines. Are any tools good at this?<p>More generally, how do you build confidence in the code, both at the PR level and eventually at the codebase level (when 90+% of code in it will be written by agents)?<p>Am I too worried about code review, are there bigger bottlenecks in our jobs when using these coding agents?